Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment and allowing defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to the proceeds of the certificate of deposit issued to “Timmy S. Holloway, Jr. by Rountree Crisp, Sr., Agent.” No triable issue of fact exists and neither party disputes the case is appropriate for summary judgment.
Ownership of the certificate of deposit is controlled by the law of gifts. The burden of proof is upon plaintiff to show each element of the gift inter vivos. Fesmire v. First Union Nat. Bank of N.C., 267 N.C. 589, 148 S.E.2d 589…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Nannie v. . PollardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- O'BRIEN v. ReeceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Plymouth Pallet Co., Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Fesmire v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992