Legal Opinion

Nannie v. . Pollard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

In 1931 T. J. Nannie died intestate and J. O. Pollard duly qualified as administrator of bis estate. Tbe plaintiffs are surviving brothers and sisters of the deceased and Bessie Nannie, a minor, is his widow and is represented by J. 0. Pollard, her guardian.

The controversy relates to a bank deposit, the appellant contending that he is entitled to the whole amount thereof in his representative capacity as guardian of the widow. The judgment sets out as an admitted fact the statement that T. J. Nannie deposited $4,343 in the savings department of the Bank of Earmville to the account of “T. J.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. . FullbrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jones v. WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Jones v. . WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Leatherman v. LeathermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Buffaloe v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API