State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of Transportation
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RATLIFF, Senior Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Relator-Appellant Jack Cittadine ("Cit-tadine") appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for a permanent mandamus order directed to Appellee-Respondent Indiana Department of Transportation ("INDOT"). Because the mandamus action pertained to enforcement of a statute against - Michigan - Southern - Railroad ("Michigan Southern"), the railroad was made a party below and is also a party on appeal. 1
We affirm.
ISSUE
The following issue, raised by both IN-DOT and Michigan Southern Railroad, is dispositive: whether Cittadine has standing to secure…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Wampler v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Pitts v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- State ex rel. Cutter v. KammanIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Berkshire v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010