Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of Transportation

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 2001No. 20A03-0010-CV-395PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RATLIFF, Senior Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Relator-Appellant Jack Cittadine ("Cit-tadine") appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for a permanent mandamus order directed to Appellee-Respondent Indiana Department of Transportation ("INDOT"). Because the mandamus action pertained to enforcement of a statute against - Michigan - Southern - Railroad ("Michigan Southern"), the railroad was made a party below and is also a party on appeal. 1

We affirm.

ISSUE

The following issue, raised by both IN-DOT and Michigan Southern Railroad, is dispositive: whether Cittadine has standing to secure…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wampler v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Pitts v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Cutter v. KammanIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Berkshire v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API