Alexander v. D.L. Sitton Motor Lines
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LIMBAUGH, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation case, we revisit the scope and application of the terms from § 287.120.1, RSMo 1986, 1 which allow recovery for injuries sustained in an accident “arising out of” the claimant’s employment. For the first time we do so in the context of the so-called “idiopathic fall.” Our jurisdiction is set out in Article V, § 10, of the Missouri Constitution.
Raymond V. Alexander filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits following an injury he sustained while employed by D.L. Sitton Motor Lines [Sitton]. After a hearing, recovery was denied by an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wolfgeher v. Wagner Cartage Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- George v. Great Eastern Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Valerio v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Ricks v. H. K. Porter, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Johnson v. Denton Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Kasl v. Bristol Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Houston v. Roadway Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Abel Ex Rel. Abel v. Mike Russell's Standard ServiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Ahern v. P & H, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.