Adams v. City of St. Louis
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RENDLEN, Judge.
This appeal, involving construction of the revenue laws of the State and the City of St. Louis comes here under Art. V, § 3, Mo.Const. (1945) as amended. See Petrolene v. City of Arnold, 515 S.W.2d 551, 552[1] (Mo.1974). Plaintiffs, who are employees or former employees of General Motors Corporation (GM) and members of the United Auto Workers (UAW), brought their action against the City of St. Louis (City) and its Collector of Revenue to recover earnings taxes paid under protest upon Supplemental Unemployment Benefits (SUB) received by them and to enjoin future collections and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Newman v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Carter Carburetor Corp. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Northeast Osteopathic Hospital v. KeitelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Agard v. RiedererSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alumax Foils, Inc. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Bachman v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hopkins v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Betz v. Telegraph Investment, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ralston Purina Co. v. LeggettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.