Legal Opinion
Bachman v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1994No. 63942PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AHRENS, Judge.
Defendants appeal the trial court’s judgment directing them to refund City of St. Louis earnings taxes paid under protest by plaintiffs on rental income received from properties that plaintiffs purchased and inherited and then leased to their family-owned businesses. We affirm.
Plaintiffs have challenged the jurisdiction of this Court and filed a Motion to Transfer this cause to the Missouri Supreme Court on the grounds that their claim involves the construction of a revenue law of Missouri. Ordinarily, the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction in all cases involving the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Rice v. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hewitt v. MastersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Queen of Diamonds, Inc. v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Carter Carburetor Corp. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Piel v. PielMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Collins v. Missouri Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Creech v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- DENNIS L. WALKER v. HALEIGH WALKER and BRADEN WALKER by their next friend, Peggie Lair, and THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF BRADLEY M. WALKER, AND THEIR UNKNOWN HERIS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES, DONEES, ALIENEES, LEGATEES, ADMINISTRATORS, EXECUTORS, GUARDIANS, MORTGAGEES, TRUSTEES AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, AND ALL OTHER PERSONS, CORPORATIONS OR SUCCESSORS CLAIMING, BY THROUGH AND UNDER THEM, Defendants-RespondentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Holdredge v. Missouri Dental BoardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.