Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. Leggett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2000No. ED 76702PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Appellants, Ralston Purina Company,1 Eveready Battery Company,2 Protein Technologies International,3 and approximately 70 executive and key employees of these corporations, (“appellants”), appeal4 the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, holding that non-qualified stock options granted to employees as part of their compensation, are subject to the City of St. Louis’ earnings tax. We affirm.

In 1997, the 70 employee-appellants, executives, and key employees of Ralston,5 exercised non-qualified stock options (“stock options”)6 previously…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Lake Cable, Inc. v. TrittlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Marchlen v. Township of Mt. LebanonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Adams v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Hopkins v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Associated Aviation UnderwritersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Willacy v. Cleveland Bd. of Income Tax Rev. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Cook v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API