Legal Opinion

Lichter v. Bowaters Southern Paper Corporation

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 26, 1959No. 21 and 30, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

This case grows out of the construction of a large paper mill at Calhoun, Tennessee.

Plaintiff, Southern Fireproofing Company (“Southern”), was the subcontractor for the masonry work. Defendant, Bowaters Southern Paper Corporation, was the owner. The general contractor was Fraser, Brace & Roane-Anderson (“Fabroan”). Fabroan acted, however, as Bowaters’ agent in the matter. Southern’s contract for the masonry work was executed by Fabroan as Bowaters’ agent. J. E. Sirrine Company (“Sirrine”) was the architect and engineer.

Southern’s contract with Fabroan was signed on March…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Railroad v. Cabinet Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Stephenson v. Commonwealth & Southern Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  5. United States v. Henke Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mertes v. MertesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  2. Cooper v. Ross & Roberts, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Kuhn Construction Company v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API