Legal Opinion

Hal S. v. Valentine

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2009No. H032581, H033376Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1528Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

The instant case concerns two appeals. Both in part relate back to James Valentine’s removal as trustee for day trading with trust funds and his payment, to himself, of $250,000 for services. In the first, case No. H032581, appellant James Valentine1 seeks review of an order of the superior court denying his objections and approving the third guardianship accounting petition filed by respondent Hal S. In the second appeal, appellant Valentine seeks review of the superior court’s order that he pay Hal S. compensatory damages in the amount of $77,573.40, based upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lealao v. Beneficial California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Estate of TruckenmillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API