Legal Opinion
Amphenol Corp. v. Paul
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 24, 2014No. Civil No. 3:12cv00543(AVC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANT, PAUL’S, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALFRED V. COVELLO, District Judge.
This is an action for damages and equitable relief in which the plaintiff, Amphe-nol Corporation (hereinafter “Amphenol”), claims that the defendant, Richard Paul, breached a non-competition agreement. It is brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030 et seq., along with tenets concerning breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duties, and unfair competition. Paul has moved *103for summary judgment on all counts, arguing that he is entitled to judgment on all the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Base One Technologies, Inc. v. AliDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
- United States v. Specialist CHRISTOPHER H. MEREDITHArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- Zap Cellular, Inc. v. WeintraubDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022