Legal Opinion

Barnum v. Lopez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1971No. B-2787PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of civil appeals concluded its opinion in this case in the following language: “Since it is our opinion that this case has not been fully developed on trial, the equities require that this cause be reversed and remanded in order that justice be done between the parties.” The court of civil appeals then entered judgment . reversing the judgment of the trial court and remanding the cause to that court for a new trial. See Lopez v. Barnum, 466 S.W.2d 612, at 616 (Tex.Civ.App. — San Antonio 1971).

An appellate court is not authorized to reverse a judgment of a trial court on the ground…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lopez v. BarnumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hausmann v. Texas Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Vandergriff v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of BreckenridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MarquezTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Martin v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API