Legal Opinion

Van Wie v. Hill

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

Appellant contends that the evidence does not support the finding as to his negligent management and control. The evidence indicates that the impact occurred on the west shoulder of Wood road. Respondent’s.car was stopped and completely off the surface of Wood road, except for the right rear wheel. The impact occurred to the right front of respondent’s car and to the front and right side of appellant’s truck. Appellant apparently intended to turn left onto the west roadway of Wood road, and to proceed south to the city of Kenosha. From this evidence the jury could reasonably have inferred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grana v. SummerfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Evjen v. Packer City Transit Line, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Grinley v. Town of Eau GalleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. MacKowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Burkhalter v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lisowski v. ChenenoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McGivern v. Amasa Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lovesee v. Allied Development Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hein v. TorgesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Agosta Vargas v. TióSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API