McCarley v. Durham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
' WILLIAMS, Justice.
Plaintiff sued defendants herein for damages resulting from an automobile accident. Defendants were father and son; the son, a minor, was the driver of the car which struck plaintiff’s car, and the father was joined as a defendant on the ground that the son was his agent, servant and employee; and on the further ground' that the son was a reckless driver and that the father knew, or should have known-such to be the casej that in spite of such knowledge, or imputed knowledge, he allowed his son to drive the car.
At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence,, the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Kurn v. RadencicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Harrod v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Outlook Farmers' Elevator Co. v. American Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
- Coker v. MooseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Green v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Strubhart v. Perry Memorial Hospital Trust AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Fox v. MizeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Southard v. Oil Equipment CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. SaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.