Legal Opinion

Locke v. McVean

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1876PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Oakland Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, J:

Locke and defendant in error, David McVean, entered into an agreement in writing on the 1st of March, 1871, of the following tenor:

“It is agreed that all sales of sewing machines which 0. M. Locke, of Detroit, Mich., shall make to David McVean,. *475of Lapeer, shall be upon, the terms and conditions following, unless it shall be otherwise in writing hereafter agreed, during the continuance of this contract. All indebtedness by account, note or otherwise, which shall arise under this contract from said D. McVean to said O. M. Locke, shall be paid when due.
“First. Machines will be packed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dobbin v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Rindge v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Wright v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  4. Hall v. RandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
  5. Russell v. PerkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1818

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Shreffler v. NadelhofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Beers v. WolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. LaRose v. Logansport National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. James Black Masonry & Contracting Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Grasser & Brand Brewing Co. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API