Legal Opinion

Canales v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 30, 2018No. B276127PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIM, J.**

*818*1265I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Fabio Canales and Andy Cortes, on behalf of themselves and class members, appeal from a summary judgment. Plaintiffs were former or current non-exempt employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Plaintiffs alleged that their wage statements failed to include information required under Labor Code 1 section 226, subdivision (a)(9). Specifically, plaintiffs argued that a line on the wage statement, "OverTimePay-Override," should, but did not, include hourly rates and hours worked. Plaintiffs also alleged defendant violated section 226 by failing to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Conroy v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Alameda Produce Market, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Magadia v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. Bawa v. TerhuneCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
  4. Anguiano-Tamayo v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. Bawa v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API