Canales v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
KIM, J.**
*818*1265I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Fabio Canales and Andy Cortes, on behalf of themselves and class members, appeal from a summary judgment. Plaintiffs were former or current non-exempt employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Plaintiffs alleged that their wage statements failed to include information required under Labor Code 1 section 226, subdivision (a)(9). Specifically, plaintiffs argued that a line on the wage statement, "OverTimePay-Override," should, but did not, include hourly rates and hours worked. Plaintiffs also alleged defendant violated section 226 by failing to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Conroy v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Alameda Produce Market, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Magadia v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Bawa v. TerhuneCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
- Anguiano-Tamayo v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Bawa v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.