Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 24, 2002No. 21, 2002PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolland, J.

Following a bench trial in the Superior Court, the defendant-appellant, Richard Davis (“Davis”), was convicted of Robbery in the First Degree. The trial judge declared Davis to be an habitual offender under title 11, section 4214(a) of the Delaware Code. Davis was sentenced to be incarcerated for twenty years.

In his direct appeal, Davis argues that the trial judge committed two errors in granting his request, pursuant to Superior Court Criminal Rule 23(a), to waive his right to a jury trial. First, Davis argues that the record does not reflect that he made an intelligent waiver of his right…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. ReyesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  3. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. State v. FooteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Hunter Hedrick v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API