Baker v. Mygatt
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Scott District Court. In Chancery. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
The complainant filed his bill in equity for the purpose of procuring the cancellation of a promissory note, given by him to the respondent, in 1857 for $2,375, and also a deed of trust, executed by the complain*132ant and his wife, to one Charles Powers, as trustees, to secure said note. The bill charges that the note and deed of trust were given for a loan of $2,055, made by Mygatt to Baker, by his agent, Charles Powers, at a usurious rate of interest. That after said loan was made, Powers continued to act as the agent of respondent, that before the commencement of this proceeding, the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Withaup v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Archer v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- State v. TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Munkers v. Farmers' Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Gibson v. BucknerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.