Legal Opinion

Inman v. Lips & Casualty Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. ■ Justice Chambliss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Insurance Company appeals from a judgment for $1000 on a policy contract and insists that on the facts shown by the stipulation in the record there is no liability. Plaintiff is the beneficiary under a limited accident policy on the life of her deceased husband, William E. Inman. He was an employee of a Nashville Furniture house and at the time of the accident which resulted in his death he was aiding in the delivery of a truck load of furniture. The truck was being driven by another employee who was riding on the driver’s seat in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seay v. Georgia Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Quintana v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  3. Brown v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Garford Trucking, Inc. v. Alliance Ins. Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Gilmore v. Continental Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API