Legal Opinion

Seay v. Georgia Life Insurance

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1915PublishedCited by 20 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. — W. B. Gabvin, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

The complainant, Seay, is a physician, and was under contract to render necessary medical attention to several hundred employees of a mine of the Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Company. He had in his employ two younger doctors as assistants.

A miner was hurt in an accident, and Dr. Seay’s office was notified. One of the assistants responded to the call, undertook to diagnose the injuries, and proceeded to treat them. In so doing the assistant acted under general directions, within the scope of his employment, but Dr. Seay appears to have had no knowledge of this particular case, or at any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  2. Crouch v. Southern Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Erik Hood v. Casey JenkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Green v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Inman v. Lips & Casualty Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Travelers Ins. Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API