Legal Opinion

Akron Bar Assn. v. Bojonell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. 1999-1616PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 154.] AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION v. BOJONELL. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Bojonell,

2000-Ohio-287.] Unauthorized practice of law—Individual not licensed to practice law in Ohio represented others and communicated on their behalf to adverse parties about settlements of causes of action–Engagement in the unauthorized practice of law enjoined. (No. 99-1616—Submitted October 20, 1999—Decided February 23, 2000.) ON FINAL REPORT of the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of the Supreme Court, No. UPL 98-4.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Akron Bar Ass'n v. BojonellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RobsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API