Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bojonell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
As we have previously held in a matter very similar to this, representing others by advising them of their rights and communicating on their behalf to adverse parties about settlements of causes of action constitutes the practice of law. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Cromwell (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 255, 695 N.E.2d 243.
Respondent is hereby enjoined from engaging in any further activities that might constitute the unauthorized practice of law. Cost are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bergantzel v. MlynarikSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Foreclosure Solutions, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Disciplinary Counsel v. RobsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Akron Bar Assn. v. BojonellOhio Supreme Court · 2000