Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Cromwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1998No. 1998-0095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 255.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. CROMWELL. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Cromwell,

1998-Ohio-237.] Unauthorized practice of law—Individual not licensed to practice law in Ohio who represents others with regard to their causes of action for injury, communicates with insurance companies about claims, makes representations to creditors on behalf of third parties, and advises persons of their rights, and the terms and conditions of settlement is engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. (No. 98-95—Submitted March…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. PurnellOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Akron Bar Assn. v. BojonellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. HenleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API