Legal Opinion

Lisker v. O'Rourke

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1903No. 1,554PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; J ohn Lindsay, Judge. ActioN by A. A. Lisker against John O’Rourke. From a judgment for defendant and from an' order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

This action was brought by the plaintiff, as surety, to obtain contribution from the defendant, his cosurety. The defendant had judgment. The plaintiff has appealed' from the judgment and an order denying a new1 trial.

’ 1. Upon the appeal from the order, the errors assigned are ulppn the rulings of the court in excluding certain evidtence offered by the plaintiff, and) in striking, out a certain statement made by the defendant when testifying in his own behalf. The evidence offered and excluded wasi neither, relevant to, nor did it tend in any way to establish, the cause of action alleged in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Brunell v. LoganMontana Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Pentz v. CorscaddenMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Franzman v. DaviesMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Stanford Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State ex rel. Bank v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API