Legal Opinion

Dye v. Sachs (In re Flashcom, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided June 24, 2013No. Bankruptcy No. 2:12-bk-16351-RK; Adversary No. 2:12-ap-01339-RKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND ANDRA SACHS DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDERS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60

ROBERT KWAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

In the original Memorandum Decision re: Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Judgment and Andra Sachs Defendants’ Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60, filed and entered on March 5, 2013 as Docket No. 634, the court ruled that it would grant the motion of defendants Andra Sachs, Ashby Enterprises and Max-Singer Partnership (collectively known as the “Andra Sachs Defendants”) for relief under Rule 60…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API