Legal Opinion

United States v. Rufino Peralta-Sanchez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2017No. 14-50393 14-50394PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dissent by Judge PREGERSON

OPINION

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

Rufino Peralta-Sanchez (Peralta) was convicted of illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325 and illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The predicate for his illegal reentry count was his expedited removal in 2012. Peralta argues that his expedited removal was fundamentally unfair and thus cannot serve as the basis of the illegal reentry count, because he was neither entitled to hire counsel nor advised of his right to apply for withdrawal of his application for admission. We find that Peralta had no Fifth Amendment due…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Rosendo Valdivias-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. Peralta-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Eladio Gomez-Velazco v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Rufino Peralta-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API