Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Sable-Oberteuffer-Peterson, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

Parties to a conditional contract of sale may specify the terms of adjusting their differences in case the buyer becomes delinquent. It is not necessary for the seller to resort to court in order to repossess the automobile and sell the same where the contract authorizes the seller so to do: Standring v. Gordon, 118 Or. 339, 345, 346 (246 Pac. 361). The contract in the instant casé provides:

“In case of default in the payment of any amount due as above provided, * * of if the undersigned shall be guilty of any breach of any of the other agreements of the undersigned herein, the second party is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. PankowOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McDaniel v. ChiaramonteOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Manley Auto Co. v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Francis v. BohartOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Standring v. GordonOregon Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Middlecamp v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Westerman v. Oregon Automobile Credit Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hewitt v. NovakMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Knoebel v. Chief Pontiac, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. McLean v. UnderdalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API