Legal Opinion
Van Dyke v. Parker
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1936No. 7879PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
On January 21, 1931, the appellee filed a complaint against the appellant and Hoval A. Smith, based upon two promissory notes executed by them at Chicago', Ill., on October 30, 1917, in favor of the appellee. Each note was for $5,000, one becoming due on December 30, 1918, and the other on June 30, 1919. The complaint purported to state a separate cause of action on each note.
The defendants filed a demurrer, setting up that the complaint did not state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action, and pleading the four-year statute of limitations of Arizona, section…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Railroad Companies v. SchutteSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Ross v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Department of Water and Power v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Van Cleef v. Aeroflex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Banana Distributors, Inc. v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.