Legal Opinion
Van Cleef v. Aeroflex Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1981No. 79-3320PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
657 F.2d 1094
Ann VAN CLEEF and William H. Brophy, Personal
Representatives of the Estate of Hubert O.
Merryweather, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The AEROFLEX CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 79-3320.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 16, 1981.
Decided Oct. 1, 1981.
William Lee McLane, Phoenix, Ariz., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants; Nola McLane, McLane & McLane, Phoenix, Ariz., on brief.
Terry Fenzl, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.
Before TUTTLE,* DUNIWAY and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Frank Coughlin, Padre Concrete Corporation, A. W. Van Cleave, Jr. And Allied Crushed Stone Company v. Capitol Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Marquis v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Rutherford v. CarrTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Ross v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1964
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Underhill v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Atkins v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Robert's Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Hatrock v. Edward D. Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Maddox v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.