Legal Opinion

White v. Taylor Distributing Co., Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2008No. Docket 134751PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion. At issue is whether the trial court properly granted summary disposition to defendant on the basis of his claim that he experienced a sudden emergency. Defendant, James Birkenheuer, rear-ended plaintiff, Sherita White, while she was stopped for a red light. By statute, the driver of a vehicle that strikes another from behind is presumed negligent. But defendant claims that, as a matter of law, the statutory presumption should not apply to him because he experienced a sudden emergency when he blacked out seconds before the collision. We disagree. We conclude that there are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. McKinney v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Vander Laan v. MiedemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Freed v. SalasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. White v. Taylor Distributing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Kranendonk v. Gregory & Swapp, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Meredith Summer v. Southfield Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API