Legal Opinion

Fish v. Nethercutt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1896No. 2265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.— Hon. Norman Buck, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The.opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Defendant Niñear was sheriff of Spokane county. Defendants Nethercutt were husband and wife and the owners of a mortgage made by one Emery Fish. The other defendants were sureties upon the official bond of said sheriff. The mortgage held by the Nethercutts was placed in the hands of the sheriff for foreclosure, and by virtue thereof the property in dispute was taken into his possession as that of the mortgagor Emery Fish. The plaintiff, the wife of said Emery Fish, brought this action to recover damages for the conversion of the property,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marquis v. WillardWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mace v. Gaddis, Washington Territory1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interior Warehouse Co. v. HaysWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. McCrea v. McCrewIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Choukas v. SeverynsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Federal Finance Co. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Melcher v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API