Legal Opinion
Southern Pacific Co. v. Pima County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1931No. Civil No. 2892PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is an action by the Southern Pacific Company against Pima county and J. W. Buchanan, treasurer and ex-officio tax collector of said county, to recover some school taxes paid to the treasurer under protest.
On June 5, 1928, common school district No. 1 of Tucson and high school district No. 1 of Tucson were by an order of the board of supervisors of Pima county enlarged to take in additional territory in which was included 2.7 miles of plaintiffs railroad. Prior to such annexation the districts’ outstanding bonded indebtedness was the sum of $1,469,000 and their taxable property, as shown…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Crabb v. Celeste Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
- White v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Skinner v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Lowden v. LutherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Elephant Butte Irr. Dist. of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- LINKY v. Board of County Com'rs of Grand CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Boyd v. BellArizona Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.