Legal Opinion

St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Milburn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 9, 1924No. 15423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

Plaintiff alleges, in substance, for his cause of action against the defendant:(3)That he was a mechanic employed by the defendant railroad company in its roundhouse in the city of Muskogee, on or about February 14, 1922.(2) That the railway company provided an emery wheel for tibe use of the employes engaged in the service of the railway company ; that the emery wheel was equipped with what is known as a rest to be set at varying distances from the wheel according to the size of the object to be ground.(3) That it was the duty of the foreman of the railway company to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. FickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. TateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lowden v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Kurn v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Milburn v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API