Legal Opinion

Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cherwin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 8, 1996No. 95-0772PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION

POLEN, Judge.

Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (Arnica) appeals the final judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Melvin Cherwin, on his claim for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. We affirm.

On February 14, 1994, Melvin Cherwin, while a pedestrian, was approached by an errant vehicle. In an effort to avoid being struck by the automobile, he dove out of the way and sustained injuries as a result of his evasive actions.

Mr. Cherwin filed a Petition for Declaratory Relief and Damages against his personal injury protection carrier, Amica. Mr. Cher-win’s claim was based on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. CastagnaSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. GOVT. EMP. INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Arnold v. South Carolina Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Lowd v. CAL KOVENS CONST. CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Smith v. Fortune Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Niglio v. OMAHA PROPERTY AND CAS. INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Milgram v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. FLORIDA PAIN & REHABILITATION OF WEST DADE v. INFINITY AUTO INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API