Legal Opinion

Milgram v. Allstate Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 27, 1999No. 98-1437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.

This is an appeal from summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), denying Kenneth Mil-gram’s (Milgram) claim for automobile Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits. Milgram contends that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment, because there exists a sufficient relationship between his injuries and the use of the insured automobile to preclude entry of summary judgment. Allstate contends, for affirmance, that Milgram’s injuries did not arise out of the ownership, use, or maintenance of a motor vehicle; and that Milgram’s injuries were not caused by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. GOV. EMPLOYEES INS. CO. v. NovakSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Hernandez v. Protective Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Jones v. Directors Guild of America, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sommerville v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance v. AlemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API