Legal Opinion
Smith v. Fortune Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 30, 1987No. 86-1078PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Judge.
Smith appeals from a final summary judgment denying him any recovery under *74his motor vehicle insurance policy for personal injury protection benefits. The insurer, Fortune Insurance Company, denied coverage because Smith’s injuries were not caused by physical contact with a motor vehicle. The lower court ruled that Smith could not recover for his personal injuries, since the record established they were not “caused by physical contact with a motor vehicle” within the meaning of section 627.-736(4)(d)l, Florida Statutes (1985). We affirm.
Section 627.736(1), Florida Statutes (1985)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. CastagnaSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Arnold v. South Carolina Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Niglio v. OMAHA PROPERTY AND CAS. INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Lowd v. CAL KOVENS CONST. CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. CherwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996