Legal Opinion

Diversified Ingredients v. Joseph Testa

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2017No. 16-2791PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

In a preliminary proposed audit, the Ohio Department of Taxation assessed Diversified Ingredients, Inc. (“Diversified”), a Missouri corporation, as owing $561,448.00 in unpaid tax, penalties, and interest under Ohio’s Commercial Activity Tax (“CAT”). Diversified commenced this action in the Eastern District of Missouri against Joseph W. Testa, the Ohio State Tax Commissioner, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Interstate Income Act, 15 U.S.C. § 381, deprives Ohio of jurisdiction to assess and collect the. CAT on Diversified’s sales of goods manufactured and shipped…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matthew Kuhns v. Scottrade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Omega Flex, Inc. v. Bonnie GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Bowes v. City of St. Louis, MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  4. Troyer v. Director, Missouri Department of RevenueDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API