Legal Opinion

State v. Meckelson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 6, 2006No. 23868-7-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

135 P.3d 991 (2006)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

David Lloyd MECKELSON, Appellant.

No. 23868-7-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

June 6, 2006.

Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, III, Attorneys at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

Susan M. Gasch, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

SWEENEY, C.J.

¶ 1 A criminal defendant receives constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel where no legitimate strategic or tactical explanation can be found for a particular trial decision. State v. Rainey, 107 Wash.App. 129, 135-36, 28 P.3d 10 (2001) (citing State v. McFarland, 127…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Montes-MalindasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. Montes-MalindasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API