Legal Opinion

Hembling v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, ■J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. 'The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover for injuries resulting from a fall upon an alleged defective sidewalk. The testimony tended to show that some of the stringers were decayed, but the planking was in a good state of preservation. The planks were 3 inches in thickness, and some 13 or 14 feet in length. They extended several inches beyond the curb. There was evidence tending to show that just before the injury a horse had been tied to one of these planks, and that just as the plaintiff came along the horse jerked one of these planks out of place, and that plaintiff stepped into the aperture, and fell.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Township of Medina v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Jones v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Heidemann v. City of Sleepy EyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. City of Indianapolis v. RayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. City of Tallahassee v. HawesSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API