Legal Opinion

Heidemann v. City of Sleepy Eye

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1935No. 30,491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

In this, an action against the city of Sleepy Eye, Minnesota, to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant had a verdict. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff, a pedestrian on the main street of the city of Sleepy Eye, was severely injured on June 11, 1984, by the falling, during an ordinary Avindstorm, of a Avooden cornice from the top of a frame building OAvned by Nellie Berliner. She was not a party defendant. The building was over 50 years old. The evidence is not clear as to Avhen the cornice Avas placed on the building,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Parker v. Mayor of MaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  2. Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Briglia v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Ryder v. KinseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. McDowell v. Village of PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WinkleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Segal v. Bloom Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Callahan v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Bassett v. RybakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API