Legal Opinion
Jorden v. National Guard Bureau
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 27, 1986No. 85-1664PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to determine the susceptibility of National Guard officers to suits by guardsmen for damages and in-junctive relief. Plaintiff, Ulus Jorden, discharged from both his military and civilian positions in the Pennsylvania Air National Guard (“PaANG”), sought damages against his superiors and reinstatement to both positions. Relying on Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 103 S.Ct. 2362, 76 L.Ed.2d 586 (1983), the district court dismissed plaintiff’s case under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(B).
Although we find that the district court acted correctly…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Wright v. ParkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Reid Knutson v. Wisconsin Air National Guard and Gerald D. SlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Michael G. Holdiness v. A.M. Stroud, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.