Legal Opinion

Wright v. Park

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 4, 1993No. 93-1206PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to consider whether civil rights actions can be maintained against military officers in the chain of command by persons employed under the National Guard Technician Act of 1968 (Technician Act), 32 U.S.C. § 709 (1988). The district court granted summary judgment because it deemed plaintiffs claims to be non-justiciable. See Wright v. Park, 811 F.Supp. 726 (D.Me.1993). Although our reasoning differs from that of the court below, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts, insofar as they are germane to this proceeding, are not seriously disputed.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Frank D. Jones v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs and New York State Army National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Lacedra v. Donald W. Wyatt Detention FacilityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  3. Soto-Torres v. FraticelliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Gary W. Bowen v. Keith Oistead United States of America Hugh L. Cox, III Dan E. Dennis, Kenneth M. Taylor State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Jentoft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API