Legal Opinion
United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 2, 2007No. Court 04-00650Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
CARMAN, Judge:
This matter is before this Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiff’s Motion”). Defendant, UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc. (“UPS” or “Defendant”), filed a timely response, and Plaintiff, the United States (“Plaintiff” or “Customs”), filed a timely reply. The Court, having considered the parties’ submissions and for the reasons that follow, denies Plaintiff’s Motion.
Background
This Court has twice issued opinions concerning the instant litigation. See United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc., 30 CIT _, 442 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (2006) (denying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Ugg International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.