Marriage of Angelos v. Angelos
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to a stipulation for dissolution, the parties agreed respondent would retain occupancy of the homestead and appellant would receive an equity interest. Appellant challenged respondent’s right to continued occupancy of' the homestead and moved that a sale be ordered. The trial court denied the motion, and we affirm.
FACTS
The parties were married on December 1, 1945 and had four children, none of whom were minors at the time of the dissolution. They entered into a stipulation for dissolution of their marriage, and the trial court issued its judgment and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marriage of Angelos v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Claybaugh v. ClaybaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Melamed v. MelamedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marriage of Saabye v. SaabyeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Moylan v. MoylanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988