Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1969No. 41489PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment and decree of divorce and from two orders of the trial court denying defendant’s motions for amended findings of fact, one of which also denied a new trial.

The only issue properly presented to us for review on this appeal is whether a trial court when granting a divorce may, in the absence of special circumstances, leave the real property acquired by the parties during coverture in joint tenancy pending a determiniation of their rights by the court at some indeterminate future date.

During their marriage, plaintiff, Eleanor H. Johnson, and defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maust v. MaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Longbotham v. LongbothamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Snyder v. SnyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Melamed v. MelamedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Leutgers v. KastenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API