State v. Neuzil
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
The sole question on this appeal is whether defendant, Christopher Neuzil, received ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to seek an instruction on specific intent during his trial for stalking in violation of a protective order. See Iowa Code § 708.11(3)(b)(l) (1997). Because we conclude the crime charged involves general, not specific, intent, we find the court properly instructed the jury and, accordingly, find no merit in defendant’s ineffectiveness claim. We therefore affirm the judgment entered on Neuzil’s conviction.
The facts are largely undisputed.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. McPhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Eggman v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. Li-Yu ChangSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- State v. HickmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- State v. HelmersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- In the Interest of D.S., Minor Child. D.S., Minor ChildSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State v. LimbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.