State v. Buchanan
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
The only question on this appeal is whether conviction of the crime of interference with official acts while armed, Iowa Code section 719.1 (1995), requires proof the defendant intended to interfere with official conduct. The district court, believing the crime to be one of general intent, refused defendant Ickey Buchanan’s request for a jury instruction defining specific intent. Finding no error, we affirm.
The facts are not disputed. Late one evening, Waterloo police officer Randall Chapman was approached by Victor Quinn who claimed that defendant Ickey Buchanan had just…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. RedmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Eggman v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. HauanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Lawyer v. City of Council BluffsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- State v. Li-Yu ChangSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. CanasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- State v. FrancoisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- In Matter of Guardianship of LWWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.