Legal Opinion
Imperial Chemical Manuf'g Co. v. Stein
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided August 7, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions
This was a suit in equity by the Imperial Chemical Manufacturing-Company against Joachim Btein and others for injunction and accounting for alleged infringement of a patent relating to tlie dyeing of hair.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
Bill for injunction and accounting, alleging infringement of patent No. 305,057, granted September 16, 1884, to 0. Albert Conti de Barbaran, and assigned to complainant. The two claims of the patent cover respectively a process for dyeing hair, and the compound or dye bath used therefor. Said claims are as follows:
“(1) Coloring- human hair or the hair or fur of animals by treating- the said hair or l'ur first with an ammoniacal solution oí nickel, and then with pyrogallic acid, substantially as hereinbefore described and set forth,
“(2) The dye bath, consisting of an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kittle v. HallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
- Rince's Metallic Paint Co. v. Prince Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1893
- Boyd v. CherryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shaffer v. Rector Well Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- A. B. Dick Co. v. HenryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907