Legal Opinion

Coates v. Coates

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided January 22, 1853PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Counsel fees for defending the suit, and moving to dissolve an injunction, may be properly included in an estimate of the damages sustained by the defendant, in consequence of the injunction.

'The plaintiff, upon the usual undertaking, had obtained an injunction restraining the defendant from the use of certain *665trade marks. This injunction was dissolved upon the motion of the defendant, founded upon his answer, and a large number of affidavits; and the merits of the controversy being thus virtually determined, the plaintiff discontinued the suit. The usual reference was then had for…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Corcoran v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Wilde v. Alfred & Louis JoelThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
  4. Raupman v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Taaks v. SchmidtNew York Supreme Court · 1860

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API