Legal Opinion

Taaks v. Schmidt

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for leave to discontinue, without costs, and to confirm referees report.

1Opinion of the Court

Leonard, Justice.

The defendants, John W. Schmidt, Ger-hard Jansen and Edward Yonder Heydt, are each consuls of different foreign governments, accredited to this country; and by virtue of their offices the plaintiff is barred from the right of maintaining an action against them in any state court.

It is not necessary to consider how far a state court is bound to exercise its authority to restore a foreign consul to any property or rights, in the possession of which he has been disturbed by the operation of an injunction order inadvertently granted, when the court were ignorant of the fact that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coates v. CoatesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grainger v. SmythNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Parker v. Commercial Telegram Co.New York Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Schildwachter v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  4. Tracy v. HernandezThe Superior Court of New York City · 1880
  5. Wenzel v. MurphyNew York Marine Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API