Legal Opinion

Raupman v. City of Evansville

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This was an action upon an injunction bond. The only question presented for our consideration is, whether the appellee was entitled to recover counsel fees as damages. The court below allowed them. The appellant does not dispute the proposition that counsel fees are recoverable, where, on motion, the temporary restraining order is dissolved. He claims, however, that where the record shows that there was no motion to dissolve, but. a trial on the merits, no matter what the result may be, no recovery can be had for.counsel fees, and cites Langworthy v. McKelvey, 25 Iowa, 48. In that case, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. BodineNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  2. City of Evansville v. PfistererIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Coates v. CoatesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
  4. Langworthy v. McKelveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pelkey v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Swan v. TimmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Hyatt v. City of WashingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Beeson v. BeesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Clevenger v. GoltryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API